The Supreme Court heard arguments Tuesday over Hawaii’s ban on carrying a handgun in public accommodations—such as stores, restaurants, and gas stations—without the property owner’s permission.

Alan Beck, lawyer for the plaintiffs, said that entering such spaces is an “implied right,” unless the property owner opposes. He said Hawaii’s law flips that presumption and requires the property owner’s prior consent. 

Neal Katyal, attorney for Hawaii and former acting U.S. solicitor general, argued the state law protects private property rights, and asserted, “it’s pretty clear an invitation to shop is not an invitation to bring your Glock.”

The ruling in the case of Wolford v. Lopez, expected this summer, will apply to any state that seeks to regulate guns. At least four other states have laws similar to Hawaii’s restrictions.

During Tuesday’s oral arguments, Justice Sonia Sotomayor asked, “Is there a constitutional right to enter private property with a gun, without an owner’s express or implicit consent?”

Beck answered, “No. You can’t enter an owner’s property without their consent, correct? Express or implicit. Correct, because that would be a trespass your honor.”

Beck........

© The Daily Signal