menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

Justices Struggle Over Venue in Case Involving Big Tech, Saudi Arabia

1 0
previous day

Justices Struggle Over Venue in Case Involving Big Tech, Saudi Arabia

Trump Responds to Critics of Plan to Pass SAVE America Act

West African Nations Demand Reparations for Slavery at UN. Shouldn’t They Be Paying Up?

Trump Gives Update on Surgeon General Nominee

House Passes Legislation to Combat Mexican Government’s Seizure of American-Owned Port

Judge, Longtime Thorn for Trump, Sides With Administration

Appeals Court Hands Trump Big Win on Detaining Illegal Immigrants

  PoliticsSecuritySocietyNews

Democrats Are Back to ‘Defund the Police,’ GOP Leadership Claims

China’s Military Went Silent Around Taiwan for First Time in Years. Why?

Congressman Asks Trump to Press China to Release Prisoners

Decoupling From China on Critical Minerals Must Be a National Security Priority

  PoliticsSecurityNews

Weaponized Immigration Methods Aimed at America

Lawmakers and Lobbyists Drop the Gloves in Ice Hockey Thriller

‘ABSURD’: House GOP Leaders Dismiss Senate DHS Bill

 PoliticsSecurityNews

House Republican Group Hijacks House Floor to Reject Radical Islam

House Passes Legislation to Combat Mexican Government’s Seizure of American-Owned Port

4 Key Election Law Battles Hitting Court Rooms During 2026 Midterms

Maryland Loves My Ratty Old Rug More Than It Loves Me

SAVE America Act Thrusts Ohio Lawmakers Into the News

Trump Tells Senators to Pass the SAVE America Act ‘for Jesus’ 

Citing ‘Echo Chamber’ on Iran, Trump Counterterrorism Chief Resigns

International Commentary

‘It’s a Very Surreal War’

Netanyahu Refutes Death Rumor With Coffee Run

Hegseth: Iran’s Leader ‘Wounded and Likely Disfigured’

Conservative and Proud: Is the Right Representing Women? 

Girl Boss vs. Trad Wife: Forced to Choose?

Beyond the Oyster Fork: An Etiquette Expert’s Tips for ‘Relationships, Work, and Life’

Is the Iran Operation ‘America First’?

The Democrats Have Descended Into Utter Nihilism

Victor Davis Hanson: The New Democratic Party

While Some Allies Hesitate, Israel Is Already in the Fight Against Iran

Victor Davis Hanson: Why Kristi Noem Failed at DHS

Justices Struggle Over Venue in Case Involving Big Tech, Saudi Arabia

Associate Justice of the Supreme Court Neil Gorsuch and Justice Brett Kavanaugh (Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post via Getty Images)

Fred Lucas / @FredLucasWH

Fred Lucas is chief news correspondent and manager of the Investigative Reporting Project for The Daily Signal. He is the author of “The Myth of Voter Suppression: The Left’s Assault on Clean Elections.” Send an email to Fred.

Supreme Court justices grew fiery at times, and occasionally comical, during Monday’s arguments in the case of a former Twitter employee who was a paid informant of the Saudi Arabian government. 

Justices considered a narrow legal question about venue–whether a defendant can be prosecuted in a place where the alleged conduct didn’t occur. 

In the case of Abouammo v. United States, plaintiff Ahmad Abouammo worked at Twitter’s San Francisco headquarters from 2013 to 2015 and had access to users’ data. Prosecutors charged him with providing information about Saudi dissidents to the Saudi government in return for lavish gifts and cash payments. 

After Abouammo left Twitter (a social media platform now known as X), FBI agents from California questioned him at his Seattle home about his conduct. While there, he created a false document and emailed it to the FBI, according to prosecutors.

Abouammo and his lawyers argued that he should never have been charged in California for falsifying documents, as the crime happened in Washington state.

The administration argued that the crime should have been charged in California. “It’s no different than pointing a gun from Seattle and shooting it to the Northern District of California,” Anthony Yang, assistant to the solicitor general, said before the court.

None of the justices seemed to buy the argument. Two justices–Amy Coney Barrett and Brett Kavanaugh–brought up hypothetical scenarios that prompted chuckles in the courtroom. 

Kavanaugh asked if the venue would have been Washington state rather than California if Abouammo had instead shredded evidence. 

Yang said the venue would still likely have been Washington state, noting that the law on destruction of evidence differs from the prohibition of creating fake invoices. 

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson intervened to say, “Now, I am completely baffled.”

After Abouammo left Twitter in 2015, he moved to Seattle and was a freelance social media consultant.

At the same time, the FBI’s San Francisco field office investigated several Twitter employees over alleged unauthorized access to personal information. Two agents from California and an assistant U.S. attorney questioned Abouammo, SCOTUS Blog reported. 

During questioning by federal agents, Abouammo asked to excuse himself to look for documents demonstrating the Saudi payments were legitimate consulting income. He fabricated a document, then emailed it to the agents in his home. 

A federal jury in San Francisco convicted Abouammo of falsifying records in connection with a federal investigation, among other charges that included his acting as an unregistered foreign agent. He was sentenced to 42 months in prison.

The U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the conviction but remanded the sentence to the district court, which reduced the remainder of his sentence. 

Abouammo argued that the Northern District of California was the wrong trial venue for the charge of falsifying records, since that occurred in Seattle. The 9th Circuit Court held that his act influenced the federal investigation of the larger crimes in San Francisco. 

Yang stressed that the investigation “was for the completion of another crime,” adding, “There is no doubt he [Abouammo] attempted to obstruct” the probe in California. He noted a tradition on this dating back to British Common Law. 

On that point, Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Neil Gorsuch pressed Yang about why, under that logic, the Boston Tea Party wouldn’t have been tried in England, given that it affected King George and the British Parliament.

However, justices also pressed Abouammo’s lawyer, Tobias S. Loss-Eaton.

He argued that Article III of the Constitution requires that trials for crimes “shall be held in the State where the said Crimes shall have been committed.” Also, the Sixth Amendment provides the right to an impartial jury. 

Loss-Eaton argued that “the government wants to have it both ways” on picking the venue for a case, saying, “The offense started and ended within 30 minutes, and he [Abouammo] never left his house.”

Justice Clarence Thomas asked, “If he saved the draft to his computer, would the crime still be committed?”

Loss-Eaton answered in the affirmative because the crime was the mere creation of the false document. 

Justices spent much of their time questioning the plaintiff’s lawyer on this point. 

Alito, who seemed skeptical of the government’s case, pressed Loss-Eaton about precedent. He cited the case of a man defrauding New Yorkers by impersonating a public official over the phone. The calls were made from outside of New York, but the court held that the fraud could be prosecuted in the Southern District of New York. 

“What’s the difference there and here except for technological changes?” Alito asked. 

Loss-Eaton replied, “A phone call works on both ends.”

California Lawmaker Files Emergency Injunction With SCOTUS Over Redistricting Map

‘WATERSHED MOMENT’: Supreme Court Rules on Gender Secrecy Policies

Consent Decree Marks Final Defeat of ‘Orwellian’ Biden ‘Censorship Regime’

Read the first chapter of The Woketopus right now for FREE

Today, even with President Trump’s victory, leftist elites have their tentacles in every aspect of our government.

The Daily Signal’s own Tyler O’Neil exposes this leftist cabal in his new book, The Woketopus: The Dark Money Cabal Manipulating the Federal Government.

In this book, O’Neil reveals how the Left’s NGO apparatus pursues its woke agenda, maneuvering like an octopus by circumventing Congress and entrenching its interests in the federal government.

You can read the first chapter of this new book for FREE in this eBook, The Woketopus: Chapter One using the secure link below.

The Tony Kinnett Cast

The Daily Signal Podcast

© 2025 The Daily Signal Media Group, Inc. All rights reserved.

We use cookies on our website. By using our website, you consent to cookies.  Learn More .  


© The Daily Signal