menu_open
Columnists Actual . Favourites . Archive
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close
Aa Aa Aa
- A +

The Harmful Legacy of BMI

35 0
08.10.2024

The Body Mass Index (BMI) is a widely used tool for categorizing individuals based on their weight relative to their height. While convenient for assessing health risks, its historical origins, arbitrary classifications, and misuse in healthcare raise serious concerns. By focusing solely on weight and height, BMI fails to consider factors such as age, sex, race, muscle mass, genetics, and fat distribution. This narrow approach has fueled misconceptions about health, reinforced weight stigma, and influenced the development of diet culture. In addition to its scientific shortcomings, the use of BMI classifications is harmful to mental health, particularly for those categorized as "overweight" or "obese." Being labeled in this way can exacerbate feelings of shame, unworthiness, and social isolation, often contributing to disordered eating behaviors and body dissatisfaction.

The BMI was introduced by Belgian mathematician Adolphe Quetelet in 1832 as the "Quetelet Index." Its purpose was not to measure individual health but to categorize populations and define a 'normal' man. Importantly, the index was based solely on data from white European males and did not account for the diversity of body sizes across ethnicities, races, and genders (Strings, 2019). Using a one-dimensional tool to assess health and risk across the population is inherently flawed, as it ignores crucial differences in body composition, genetics, and overall health markers.

One of the most concerning aspects of BMI is the arbitrary nature of its classifications—'normal,' 'overweight,' and 'obese.' These categories are not based on solid scientific evidence but have been influenced by various stakeholders, including the pharmaceutical industry. In 1998, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) lowered the threshold for 'overweight' from a BMI of 27.8 to 25, instantly reclassifying millions of Americans as 'overweight.' This shift may have been driven partly by the interests of companies producing weight-loss drugs, as some committee members had ties to these industries. This reclassification fueled societal fears of 'obesity' and intensified diet culture, further stigmatizing individuals with higher BMIs (Oliver, 2006).

The simplistic correlation between BMI and health is misleading. Research has demonstrated that individuals categorized as 'overweight' or mildly 'obese' may have better health outcomes than those in the........

© Psychology Today


Get it on Google Play