menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

DSA radicals trying to centralize power by scrapping the Senate are completely ignorant of our history

8 0
29.07.2026

US News Metro Long Island Politics

Sports NFL MLB Olympics NBA NHL College Football College Basketball WNBA

Entertainment TV Movies Music Celebrities Awards Theater

Lifestyle Weird But True Sex & Relationships Viral Trends Human Interest Parenting Fashion & Beauty Food & Drink Travel

Health Wellness Fitness Health Care Medicine Men’s Health Women’s Health Mental Health Nutrition

Science Space Environment Wildlife Archaeology

Today’s Paper Covers Columnists Horoscopes Crosswords & Games Sports Odds Podcasts Careers

Email Newsletters Official Store Home Delivery Tips

Switch between CA and NY editions here.

DSA radicals trying to centralize power by scrapping the Senate are completely ignorant of our history

See more of our coverage in your search results.

The Democratic Socialists of America don’t like being called Communists, though many members might echo the sentiment of leftist influencer Hasan Piker when he says, “I don’t have an issue with an end goal of communism.”

Yet however the group self-identifies, its agenda is openly revolutionary.

Its plans call for, among other things, abolishing the US Senate and making the executive branch and the Supreme Court subservient to the House of Representatives.

Like many a revolutionary organ, the DSA acts as a party within a party, and it increasingly represents the youth wing of the Democrats.

Elected officials aligned with the group, like Zohran Mamdani and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, look to be the future of the party.

Yet the DSA’s ideas are remarkably old-fashioned — so old, in fact, they were refuted by John Adams in 1787.

That was the year he began publishing a multi-volume work called “A Defence of the Constitutions of the United States of America.” (It was so long ago Americans still spelled “defence” with a “c.”)

The book refers to “constitutions,” plural, because Adams hadn’t seen the new US Constitution drawn up in Philadelphia that year: He was actually defending the state constitutions against French intellectuals who insisted they should be more radical.

Fast Takes: Leave the theatrics to Hollywood, Dems outgrew common sense and more

MS NOW’s Joe Scarborough urges Dems to condemn DSA ‘radicals’ in scathing takedown

Mamdani’s........

© New York Post