Share this Story : National Post Copy Link Email X Reddit Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr

Matthew Taub: A year later, what happened to Carney's conditions for recognizing Palestine?

Conditions that do not have to be met are not conditions. They are political cover

You can save this article by registering for free here. Or sign-in if you have an account.

Global Affairs Canada was asked to identify the conditions governing one of Canada’s most consequential foreign-policy decisions in decades. Did Ottawa establish benchmarks before recognizing Palestine? Which had been met? Was there a monitoring process, and what consequences would follow if the remaining commitments failed?

Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.

Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events.

Unlimited online access to National Post.

National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.

Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.

Support local journalism.

Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.

Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events.

Unlimited online access to National Post.

National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.

Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.

Support local journalism.

Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.

Access articles from across Canada with one account.

Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.

Enjoy additional articles per month.

Get email updates from your favourite authors.

Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.

Access articles from across Canada with one account

Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments

Enjoy additional articles per month

Get email updates from your favourite authors

Sign In or Create an Account

It could not name one, I know because I emailed them to ask.

Matthew Taub: A year later, what happened to Carney's conditions for recognizing Palestine? Back to video

Instead, the department exposed a contradiction between what Prime Minister Mark Carney told Canadians one year ago and how his government now explains its decision. On July 30, 2025, Carney said recognition was “predicated” on commitments from Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas to fundamentally reform Palestinian governance, hold general elections in 2026 in which Hamas could play no part and demilitarize the Palestinian state.

The National Post newsletter that doesn’t hold back, giving readers the unvarnished truth on media, politics and culture.

There was an error, please provide a valid email address.

By signing up, you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.

A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder.

The next issue of Right? will soon be in your inbox.

We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again

Interested in more newsletters? Browse here.

This week, Global Affairs used different language in its response: “Canada’s recognition decision was based on the Palestinian Authority’s commitment to reforms.” This distinction matters.

What Global Affairs now appears to be suggesting is that recognition was not based on completed reforms, elections, Hamas’s exclusion or demilitarization. It was based on a commitment to pursue them.

That is the difference between a condition and a promise.

Global Affairs........

© National Post