J.D. Tuccille: A disappointing DOGE is better than no DOGE at all
Despite Elon Musk's efforts, the U.S. government was always going to keep growing
You can save this article by registering for free here. Or sign-in if you have an account.
Elon Musk’s departure from his temporary role with the Trump administration creates an opportunity to assess the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) that he created to shape a smaller, leaner federal government. There’s no doubt that the job is necessary; government in the U.S. and especially at the federal level has metastasized over the years in size, scope, and power beyond affordability — or the bounds of respect for people’s liberty.
Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.
Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
Unfortunately, depending on how you look at it, DOGE has so far delivered something between disappointment and failure.
This newsletter tackles hot topics with boldness, verve and wit. (Subscriber-exclusive edition on Fridays)
By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.
A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder.
The next issue of Platformed will soon be in your inbox.
We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again
Interested in more newsletters? Browse here.
When the idea of DOGE was first floated, Musk boldly predicted that $2 trillion could be cut from the federal budget. Predictably, after the election was won by Donald Trump and his Republicans, Musk hedged a bit, saying “I think if we try for $2 trillion, we’ve got a good shot at getting $1 (trillion).”
That was a walk-back, but still a credible effort to address a federal government that is on its way to spending $6.75 trillion this year and takes a growing bite from the economy. As the U.S. Department of the Treasury