Colby Cosh: Supreme Court to decide which comes first — Crown oath or Sikh faith
Share this Story : National Post Copy Link Email X Reddit Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr
Colby Cosh: Supreme Court to decide which comes first — Crown oath or Sikh faith
Top court to contemplate when duties of religion can overtake duties of state loyalty
You can save this article by registering for free here. Or sign-in if you have an account.
On Thursday morning, the Supreme Court of Canada delivered a little surprise package: it has agreed to entertain the Alberta government’s appeal of Wirring v. Law Society of Alberta, a 2025 decision in which the province’s appeal court struck down the requirement for prospective lawyers to take an oath of allegiance to the sovereign.
Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.
Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events.
Unlimited online access to National Post.
National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.
Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.
Support local journalism.
Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.
Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events.
Unlimited online access to National Post.
National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.
Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.
Support local journalism.
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
Access articles from across Canada with one account.
Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.
Enjoy additional articles per month.
Get email updates from your favourite authors.
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
Access articles from across Canada with one account
Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments
Enjoy additional articles per month
Get email updates from your favourite authors
Sign In or Create an Account
Prabjot Wirring, an Edmontonian, finished articling and thereby qualified for the Alberta bar in 2022. He claimed in court — creating some analytical complexity and confusion about his religious beliefs — that he wasn’t aware that practicing law in Alberta required him to swear allegiance to anybody or anything. He had no problem taking two other professional oaths that require lawyers to serve the public interest and treat their clients properly.
Colby Cosh: Supreme Court to decide which comes first — Crown oath or Sikh faith Back to video
It was the particular concept of allegiance that gave him a problem of conscience, because Wirring is a baptized “Amritdhari” Sikh. This is a higher-level commitment to religious purity within the Sikh faith, a holy order that involves a special ceremony of consecration, and in Wirring’s view he is forbidden from taking any oath that could........
