The United States and Israel did not stumble into war with Iran. They were driven into it — by the relentless drumbeat of political rhetoric, by catastrophic miscalculation, by the outsized egos of two narcissistic leaders who fancied themselves military geniuses, and by two clocks ticking to entirely different rhythms. Understanding these four drivers is not an academic exercise. It is an autopsy of a war foretold as a disaster.

I. Rhetoric: The Art of the Gaslight

Wars are rarely declared; they are narrated into existence. Trump and Netanyahu proved masters of this dark art. For months before the first bomb fell, they conducted a relentless rhetorical campaign, painting Iran as an existential threat on the cusp of acquiring a nuclear weapon. Steve Witkof solemnly informed the American public that Iran was “one week away” from military-grade enriched uranium. The American and Israeli peoples were, in short, gaslit — maneuvered into believing that the choice was binary: act now, or face nuclear annihilation.

Trump’s rhetoric on the war’s brevity and ease was equally audacious. Standing before a crowd just twelve days after the first airstrikes, he declared: “Let me say, we’ve won. You never like to say ‘too early’, you won—we won. We won the bet. In the first hour, it was over.” On another occasion, he told CBS the war was “very complete.” Stocks soared instantly. Somebody made billions. And yet the bombs kept falling.

This was not an intelligence briefing; it was theatre. For a man who views the world as a stage — and foreign policy as a series of low-stakes brand deals — the optics were the only reality that mattered: a quick win, a neat soundbite, a victorious pivot. The public was not informed; it was performed for.

READ: Israel warns US it is running low on missile interceptors: Report

II. Miscalculation: A Pyrrhic Overture

King Pyrrhus of Epirus defeated the Romans at Asculum in 279 BC — but at such devastating cost that he reportedly said: “One more such victory and I am undone.” The spirit of that warning hangs over the Iran campaign like a shroud.

Trump and Netanyahu assured their publics that Operations Epic Fury and Roaring Lion would be swift and surgical: three to four days, perhaps a week. Iran’s leadership would be decapitated. Its capacity to retaliate would be destroyed. The Iranian people, liberated from their oppressors, would rise and topple the regime. Everyone would go home happy. These proved to be fanciful and wishful thinking of the most dangerous kind.

How could the Pentagon, the CIA, and Mossad — among the most formidable intelligence and military organizations in human history — be so catastrophically wrong? The answer, in part, is that they were not entirely wrong. Their professional assessments were overridden by political imperative. The generals warned of a Middle East quagmire. They warned that Iran in 2026 is not Iraq in 2003. They were not listened to. The hydra was struck. The hydra remains.

III. Hubris: Caesar, Hannibal, and Two Men in a Mirror

The Greeks had a word for the fatal overconfidence of great men: hubris. They also had a goddess to punish it: Nemesis. Both Trump and Netanyahu exhibit the clinical profile of narcissistic leadership that renowned psychologists have documented at length. They view themselves as world-class strategists, capable of discerning what lesser minds cannot. They believe themselves to be military geniuses — peers of Caesar, Hannibal, and George C. Marshal.

Netanyahu stroked Trump’s ego with surgical precision. He knew which buttons to push. Together, they amplified each other’s grandiosity, drowning out the cautionary voices of their respective military establishments. And there was another accelerant: both men were running from the law. Netanyahu carried three criminal charges. Trump carried his own legal shadow. War, historically, has served as a useful narcotic for embattled leaders — a grand diversion, a stage upon which to recast oneself as a saviour rather than a defendant.

Former IDF Chief of Staff Gadi Eisenkot warned that “reliance on a single American leader’s whims is not a security doctrine; it is a gamble.” The gamble was placed. The wheel is still spinning.

READ: Countries to deploy warships with US to keep Strait of Hormuz ‘open, safe’: Trump

IV. Two Conflicting Clocks: The Short Game and the Long War

Of all four drivers, this is perhaps the most consequential — and the most overlooked. Trump and Netanyahu entered this war with fundamentally different clocks in mind, and neither man told the other the truth about his timeline.

Trump’s political instincts are built on the ephemeral. As veteran diplomat Aaron David Miller observed, he views foreign policy “not as a marathon, but as a series of sprints where he can break the tape and claim the gold before the breathing gets heavy.” American voters, weary of forever wars that have hollowed out the imperial treasury, want out. A quick declaration of victory satisfies that domestic hunger.

Netanyahu’s clock runs on a register entirely different. For him, the war with Iran is the fulfillment of a forty-year obsession. His lifelong dream of confronting Tehran had finally, and perhaps fatally, come to pass. He knew his military alone could not subdue Iran. He needed America’s B-52s, B-1s, B-2s, and aircraft carriers. He needed the big gun. And so he reeled Trump in — never revealing that he envisaged a long war of attrition, not a weekend excursion. He reckoned, perhaps naively, that once America was in, Trump would not abandon him. He may not know Trump as well as he thought.

John Bolton, Trump’s former National Security Advisor, has warned that “the President’s desire for a win often overrides the strategic necessity of a finish.” When Trump eventually takes his victory lap — and he will — Israel will be left to face a multi-front war of attrition alone. The “Day After” will not be a sunrise. It will be a blackout.

The Whetstone of Time

Taken together, these four drivers — rhetoric, miscalculation, hubris, and two conflicting clocks — produced a war that was, at its core, an act of collective self-deception. Iran does not play short games. It is a student of attrition, a civilization that measures strategic time in centuries, not news cycles. The late Hossein Salami, commander-in-chief of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, had long made clear that Tehran’s strategy was “the erosion of the Zionist entity’s patience, one drone and one day at a time.” Perhaps a hyperbole, but it encapsulates the Mullahs’ grand strategy.

Strategic analyst Max Boot noted with grim accuracy that “American victories are often just intermissions for our allies’ tragedies.” Israel now risks becoming the next case study in that systemic imperial amnesia. From Saigon to Kabul, the graveyard of American promises is well-populated. Has Netanyahu gambled his fortune— and his country’s security — on a man who values loyalty only so long as it is profitable?

Trump will declare victory and leave the stage. The applause in Washington will fade, replaced by the silence of an abandoned ally. As the old Persian proverb warns: “The sword may be sharp, but the whetstone of time is sharper.” For Netanyahu, the forty-year dream may have finally become a waking nightmare. Victory declared is not victory achieved. The hardest battles are not behind him. They are the price of a wish fulfilled.

OPINION: Netanyahu’s lifelong obsession with striking Iran and his looming spectacular defeat

The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Monitor.

© Middle East Monitor