The debate over the Great Nicobar project has quickly turned into a familiar shouting match. It was re-ignited a few days ago when Rahul Gandhi released a video from the project site, standing amid what he described as a threatened stretch of forest, and called the plan the "biggest scam" while warning of large-scale ecological destruction and the endangerment of tribal communities.

The video travelled fast, and so did the reactions. Supporters saw it as a necessary alarm. Critics dismissed it as political theatre. Neither response, once again, captures the full picture.

At its core, the project sits on a simple but uncomfortable truth. India does need a stronger presence in the eastern Indian Ocean. The geography is too important to ignore.

The Malacca Strait, just to the east of Great Nicobar, carries a significant share of global trade and energy flows. Any country that aspires to be more than a regional power cannot remain absent from such a location. For India, this is not an abstract ambition. It is about maritime security, trade leverage and long-term strategic positioning. In that sense, the government is not wrong.

Also Read: What is the Great Nicobar airport project and why is it controversial?

A foothold in Great Nicobar, with an airstrip and naval facilities, would give India reach and visibility in a zone that is becoming increasingly contested. It would reduce dependence on distant bases and strengthen India’s role in the broader Indo-Pacific conversation. Ignoring this dimension would be strategically naive.

But acknowledging the need for a presence is not the same as endorsing the scale and design of the current project. That is where the real problem lies, and where some of the concerns raised in Rahul Gandhi's intervention, stripped of rhetoric, begin to resonate.

The plan is not limited to a military or logistics facility. It combines a large transshipment port, an international airport, a power plant, and an entire township designed to support a sizeable........

© Mathrubhumi English