Flirting with Apocalyptic War in Iran

It was a colossal breakdown of strategic intelligence that failed to anticipate Iran’s refusal to bow to such aggressive militarism, entirely ignoring Iran’s retaliatory options together with its readiness to absorb suffering and devastation rather swallow a second devastating onslaught by Israel and the United States.  

From almost all perspectives the ongoing Iran War is one of the greatest international blunders in modern history, and far worse than this, poses the highest risks of stumbling into an apocalyptic warfare since the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962. This joint unprovoked war of aggression, falsely rationalized by considerations of regional security and humanitarian benevolence, unleashed by Israel and the United States while the ghastly genocide in Gaza continues. Beyond this, Israel is rapidly extending its Gaza combat tactics to the West Bank and southern Lebanon while the world is distracted by the ongoing global ripple effects and potential escalating violence in the Iran War.

Such a lethal chain of events is further aggravated by Trump’s narcissist theatrics, a personalized and bewildering brand of pathologic geopolitics that should frightens the sane among us by its clear preference for raising escalation risks to the rooftops rather than reversing course to avoid being demeaned as ‘a loser’ or ‘spineless’ in the face of Iranian resistance. It was a colossal breakdown of strategic intelligence that failed to anticipate Iran’s refusal to bow to such aggressive militarism, entirely ignoring Iran’s retaliatory options together with its readiness to absorb suffering and devastation rather swallow a second devastating onslaught by Israel and the United States.  

Likely, one explanation for these miscalculation by the 2026 aggressors was a misinterpretation of the first Iran war, which Israel initiated on June 13, 2025 with finishing touches by U.S. in the form of major air strikes dropping huge bombs on Israel’s nuclear facilities twelve days later. Iran’s soft response was evidently attributed to its weakness as well as an inflated assessments of the damage done to Iran’s nuclear facilities, military sites, and leadership infrastructure. Less than a year later, underestimating Iran’s recovery and greatly improved missile capabilities this second Iran War was initiated. Iran’s internal unrest and protests stimulated by decades of sanctions, apparently made this an irresistible time to launch a second Iran War under a suddenly populist Trump urging the Iranians to seize the occasion of the war ‘to take back their country,’ a message faring no better than barrage of missile and bombing attacks. This second Iran War was initiated by the U.S., a particularly perfidious act given the conflict-resolving negotiations underway between Iran and the United States, moderated by Oman whose mediator voiced public optimism about prospects for a broad agreement.

Confusion reigns at present. Whether the war is on the verge of dangerous escalation or a diplomatic reversal of course remains clouded by inconsistent signs. Trump mounts a 48 hour ultimatum demanding Iran’s surrender or experience the destruction of its energy infrastructure, prompting Iran to make counter-threats of the same nature but directed at the entire Gulf region. After which, Trump suspended the threats shortly after they were issue explaining that strong talks with Iran were underway and going well. Iran quickly contradicted Trump’s upbeat comments and disclosed its own far-reaching demands for a durable future, which seemed far from conveying a readiness to submit to the will of its aggressors. Iran’s........

© Il Manifesto Global