‘All-Star’ panelists Kimberley Strassel, Jessica Tarlov and Hugh Hewitt discuss Vice President Kamala Harris’ lack of interviews and news conferences on ‘Special Report.’

How bad would a Kamala Harris presidency be? Even great believers in the genius of our Constitution—and it is a work of genius and as amended has given Americans a citizenship that is the envy of the world—have to lose sleep over the prospect of four years of President Harris.

That would be a very bad run for the country. A very, very bad run.

How bad depends of course on whether the House remains Republican and the Senate flips to GOP control. But assume the worst case for a Constitutionalist: Somehow the ongoing makeover of the Vice President cons the electorate and, like President Biden and President Obama, Harris has majorities in both houses.

On Wednesday, Axios relayed from the Harris campaign that "A big part of the Harris plan is to unapologetically change some of her more liberal positions, and claim her White House experience helped change her mind. Yes, when she was running for president in 2019, she was against fracking, for decriminalizing illegal border crossings, and for single-payer health care (Medicare for All)."

Given that all of these positions and many more hard left policy views defined her presidential campaign in 2019, they define her still. (Her campaign collapsed on the same year it launched, before 2020 primary and caucus voting began.) Harris ran as the authentic San Francisco Democrat that she has always been: a hard left Democrat. The Democratic Party electorate in 2019 wouldn’t even let Harris get to the starting line in 2020 in Iowa and we all know why: She’s a terrible candidate with views on public policy that were baked into her cake from a life in the Bay Area.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

What would the United States look like after four years of President Harris and Democrats in control of the Hill? Look at San Francisco and Oakland. There’s your answer.

On the three........

© Fox News