The Islamic Republic of Iran faces its most critical moment in 2026 because its economy has completely failed, and its people have lost trust in their government, while demonstrations continue across the country. The idea of U.S.-led military intervention to eliminate the clerical regime and establish a secular government under Reza Pahlavi has progressed from being an extreme concept to becoming a potential strategic approach. The strategy attempts to match Iranian foreign policy with Western goals while supporting secular living, but it fails to gain support from the local population. A government established through foreign intervention is likely to experience complete collapse and prolonged civil war, resulting in the emergence of separate territories that will undermine the stability foreign powers aim to establish. The method fails to consider how Iranian citizens maintain their national identity while the current political system exists through its intricate system of power relationships.

The successful transition faces its greatest challenge because the 1953 military takeover, which removed Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh from power, created a lack of public trust in the government. The U.S. military action to stop Iranian democratic progress for oil gain has made the Pahlavi dynasty known as a foreign-controlled regime throughout history. The United States would need to support Reza Pahlavi’s return, but this move would be seen as a new attempt to establish colonial control. A government dependent on American directives cannot adequately respond to the nationalist aspirations of the Iranian people. The decision between foreign control and clerical rule presents citizens with a dilemma because it appears........

© Eurasia Review