Natural Resources Are Not Automatic Wealth: Oil and other resources only become valuable through human ingenuity, technology, entrepreneurship, and supportive institutions; many resource-rich countries suffer the “resource curse” of corruption, Dutch disease, and underdevelopment.

Norway’s Model Avoided the Resource Curse: Guided in part by Iraqi geologist Farouk al-Kasim, Norway taxed net profits with investment incentives, created a large sovereign wealth fund (now ~400% of GDP) invested abroad, maintained property rights and rule of law, and achieved high extraction efficiency—preventing currency overvaluation and short-term political spending.

Institutions and Human Action Matter More Than Geology: Norway’s prosperity stemmed from competitive markets, long-term saving and investment, and policies that rewarded production rather than consuming windfalls, illustrating that wealth is created by people and incentives, not simply found in the ground.

Why are some resource-rich countries poor while others grow spectacularly wealthy off their natural world?

The relevant question isn’t why some places or people are poor, since that’s the default state of humanity, but why some places and times and peoples have stumbled upon institutions and economic operations that propel them into unfathomable wealth (at least relatively speaking).

Natural resources are not wealth in themselves. Oil in the earth or beneath the seabed had no economic value until crafty entrepreneurs, engineers, and investors discovered how to transform it into productive inputs valuable in production. What mattered wasn’t geology but economic evaluation and technological means.

What’s worse, around the world, countries “blessed” with natural resource endowments like oil have repeatedly become poorer, more corrupt, and less productive after their discovery of this black gold.

Economists know this as the “resource curse,” a specific version of which is the Dutch disease where the resource-rich country’s fiat currency gets bid up and undermines most other sectors’ competitiveness. The political-economy version of this makes the political machinery beholden to resource extraction, sacrificing people and infrastructure, and quite often property rights and democratic efforts, too; distorted price signals and government dictates replacing market activity.

When Norway found oil in the North Sea in the late 1960s, the frigid Arctic country largely escaped this fate. And strangely, nobody contributed more........

© Eurasia Review