Democrats are riding high in recent polls, but this surge may owe more to the current administration’s missteps than to their own vision. Without a generative, long-term blueprint—like Project 2025 on the right or the Green New Deal—liberal gains risk feeling reactive rather than transformative. What might a durable Democratic project look like, and how could it turn short-term momentum into lasting influence?

The current liberal surge feels real, a swell in public sentiment that suggests energy and possibility. Polling numbers rise, and political commentators point to renewed enthusiasm for Democrats, but beneath the surface, the vitality is uneven. Polls show Democrats holding a seven-point advantage over Republicans on voting intention for Congress—their largest lead since the Economist/YouGov polls resumed after the 2024 election. Part of this advantage reflects the fact that Republicans are more likely to express uncertainty or abstain from voting, highlighting that much of the surge is contingent rather than driven by a fully cohesive vision. The strength is reactive, a response to errors, missteps, and stumbles by the administration in power, rather than an expression of an internally coordinated strategy. It is the kind of strength that appears in contrast, that feeds on the visible failures of others rather than articulating its own direction. This is hollow power—energy that circulates because of the misfortunes of an opponent rather than the initiative of those who seem to ride its wave.

History provides clarity on why reactive momentum is not the same as lasting influence. Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s New Deal offers an instructive example of political energy structured with purpose. Programs like Social Security, the Works Progress Administration, and labor protections were not merely responsive to immediate crises; they created durable frameworks that reshaped governance and society. They laid a foundation, a scaffold upon which public life could be stabilized, organized, and expanded. Strength anchored in vision is enduring. Strength that responds only to crises is often temporary, leaving gains vulnerable to reversal when circumstances shift.

Civil Rights legislation demonstrates a similar principle. The movement of the 1950s and 1960s mobilized coalitions across regions, races, and political affiliations. The Voting Rights Act and Civil Rights Act were structural interventions, designed........

© Eurasia Review