The controversy and criticism surrounding the issue of the data collection and profiling of mosques, masjids, their imams, muezzins and other administrative representatives, including their families in Jammu and Kashmir (J&K) appears to be a typical case of much ado about nothing.

Opposition political parties, religious and social entities have criticised this initiative, as “intrusive” and “threatening”, as well as a clear violation of the fundamental right to religious freedom and privacy. However, the counter argument that these measures are mandatory requirements for security, accountability as well as to curb the spread of any form of anti-social radical ideology is undoubtedly very compelling.

Though the first of its kind, this initiative when seen in the broader context is definitely in public interest as it is aimed at enhancing the overall efficiency of the socio-economic, administrative and developmental matrix that has defined the UT in the last six years.

If one were to engage in a comparative exercise about this profiling exercise, there is conclusive evidence that what the center and UT administration in J & K is doing is nothing new or outlandish, but a rationale exercise. The naysayers need to look at Saudi Arabia which follows one of the most centralised systems of mosque oversight in the Muslim world.

The Saudi Ministry of Islamic Affairs, Dawah and Guidance, issues licenses for mosques; appoints and pays imams, muezzins and khateebs; maintains a close watch on content of sermons and other........

© Eurasia Review