It was a normal evening on 24th June in Caracas. Amidst an ongoing political and economic crisis, partially induced by the Operation Absolute Resolve in January 2026, the city was functioning. Dayana Patiño, a mother who had just given birth 18 days prior, was doing her chores when the western/north-central parts of the country were struck with twin earthquakes of magnitude 7.2 and 7.5. Initially taking it for a “light tremor”, she rushed to her son’s cradle. The intensity of the earthquakes was so high that she felt like she was flying. She said, “I felt like I was flying. After that, I felt like I was sinking in water and dirt, and then I fell into the pit where I remained. I don’t know how I didn’t let go of my baby because I was flying. I got crushed against furniture”. Dayana and her 18 day old baby were stuck under the ruins of the rubble of the building, hoping for a chance to survive, which finally came after a 32-hour rescue operation when Dayana’s scream for help and her son’s cries were heard by the rescue team.

While through stories like these hope has survived, the reality has been devastating for many families around the country. As of 29th June 2026, more than 1450 people have lost their lives in this unfortunate event. However, the question of whether Venezuela’s woes will ever end remains tied not just to geological stability, but to a global geopolitical framework that consistently views the nation through an extractive lens. Academic inquiry suggests that the Venezuelan crisis could risk being the latest iteration of a historical pattern where the international community utilizes humanitarian distress to facilitate the extraction of national sovereignty, economic capital, and local agency. By examining the “post-earthquake story” of Haiti, we can identify a blueprint for how international intervention often hollows out the state it claims to rescue, leaving behind a “quasi-private” shell of a nation.

The Extraction of Sovereignty: From ‘Absolute Resolve’ to Relief

The earthquakes of June 2026 did not strike a stable state, they hit a nation whose institutional capacity had been systematically undermined. The political landscape was defined by the aftermath of the U.S.-led “Operation Absolute Resolve” in January 2026, which resulted in the military capture and removal of President Nicolás Maduro. While the installation of Interim President Delcy Rodríguez was framed as a restoration of democratic order, it created a profound leadership vacuum that crippled the state’s ability to coordinate a rapid response to the subsequent seismic disaster.

Drawing upon Hans Morgenthau’s realist paradigm, states primarily act in their own strategic self-interest, often masking these intentions with humanitarian rhetoric. The deployment of SOUTHCOM personnel and the mobilization of $150 million in aid could be viewed as mechanisms for maintaining strategic control over the region’s energy resources rather than genuine state-building. This reflects a form of political extraction, where the price of aid is the total restructuring of the recipient state’s ideology and the surrender of domestic control over critical infrastructure like the Simon Bolivar International Airport and the port of La Guaira.

The ‘NGO Republic’ Blueprint and Haiti Post-Earthquake 

To understand the risks facing Venezuela, one must look at the “NGO Republic” that emerged in Haiti following the 2010 earthquake. Despite a global influx of $9 billion in official aid and $3 billion in private donations, the Haitian state was systematically bypassed. The international community’s response was characterized by “progressive unrealism”, the pursuit of lofty democratic goals while ignoring the material reality of state decay.

A primary critique of the post-2010 story is the sidelining of local government institutions. Less than 10% of official aid went to the Haitian government, and less than 1% was allocated to local Haitian organizations. This created a “quasi-private state”, where foreign non-governmental organizations (NGOs) became the primary providers of up to four-fifths of social services, including 70% of........

© Eurasia Review