CounterPunch Exclusives

CounterPunch Exclusives

Who Decides What Is Legitimate? Power, Democracy, and the War on Iran

Democracy is invoked as moral legitimacy in war, while Iran’s authority rests on layered political, religious, and historical foundations.

Democracy, however, is not the enemy. Its manipulation is.

For decades, Western political discourse has equated legitimacy with elections—numbers counted on a single day, certified by institutions that themselves operate within systems shaped by immense financial power. The result is a troubling reduction: legitimacy becomes procedural rather than moral.

In the United States, democracy functions within a political economy deeply influenced by corporate financing, lobbying structures, and concentrated media ownership. Public opinion is not merely informed; it is engineered. Electoral competition exists, but within boundaries drawn by wealth and institutional continuity.

Yet when Donald Trump wins an election, legitimacy is treated as absolute. It matters little that he faces accusations that range from criminal misconduct to constitutional overreach. It matters little that his policies may violate international humanitarian law. It matters little that his administration’s military actions result in civilian deaths abroad.

He is legitimate because the vote totals aligned.

The assumption is clear: democracy automatically sanctifies power. But electoral success does not neutralize war crimes. It does not erase violations of international law. It does not transform contested policies into moral truths.

Democracy is valuable. But it is not a moral deterrent.

Israel’s Democratic Shield

Nowhere is this branding more visible than in Israel.

Israel’s claim to being “the only democracy in the Middle East” has long served as diplomatic armor. The phrase is invoked not merely as a political description but as an insulation from scrutiny.

Benjamin Netanyahu, despite facing international legal action and accusations related to the Gaza genocide, continues to present Israel’s democratic framework as evidence of moral standing. Elections are cited as proof of legitimacy. Parliamentary debate is offered as evidence of healthy political balance.

But democracy........

© CounterPunch