Photo by Michael Carruth

“The truth is rarely pure and never simple,” wrote Oscar Wilde. That observation holds true for press freedom on both sides of the Atlantic. The US mythologises its First Amendment as near-sacred, while the UK leans on common law and tradition. Both present themselves as guardians of liberty. Yet in both countries, foreign and independent journalists soon discover that freedom often comes with quiet constraints—sometimes blunt, sometimes subtle, always consequential.
“You can’t handle the truth!” Jack Nicholson sneered in A Few Good Men. Many foreign journalists in the US don’t wait to be told. They censor themselves first—scrubbing social media, I am told, stripping bylines, cancelling travel, or resorting to burner phones. A 2025 Poynter survey confirms the trend: non-citizen reporters routinely shrink their presence to remain invisible.
Visas, which are ostensibly work permits, function as levers of control. Proposals to cut correspondent visas or deny renewals amount to indirect censorship: each approval or rejection becomes a kind of referendum on which voices are allowed to remain.
The consequences are pretty personal. Salvadoran journalist Mario Guevara was arrested in Atlanta in 2025 while covering a protest. Charges were dropped, but ICE immediately detained him for deportation proceedings. Advocates call it a calculated use of immigration status to punish reporting. Earlier, Mexican reporter Emilio Gutiérrez Soto spent years in US detention before finally winning asylum in 2024. Chinese and Pakistani journalists have faced similar retaliation through visa denials or abrupt expulsions.
The US Press Freedom Tracker recorded eleven prior restraints in 2023—apparently the highest since monitoring began in 2017. Courts remain sceptical, but their appearance........

© CounterPunch