Blizzard of Contradictions

Brian C. Joondeph | March 2, 2026

Stop Government from Making Bets on the Future

Christopher Chantrill | March 2, 2026

New Yorkers Voted for Mamdani’s 'Affordability;' Now They Pay the Price

Joseph Ford Cotto | March 2, 2026

After Minneapolis: The Constitutional Reckoning

Peter Nichols | March 2, 2026

Is It ‘America Alone’ In The Fight To Save The West From China And Islam?

Janet Levy | March 2, 2026

The Gospel According to Hillary

T.R. Clancy | March 2, 2026

US Interests and a Far-Off Use of Force

John F. Di Leo | March 2, 2026

The Target For Tonight is … Tehran

Ned Barnett | March 1, 2026

Trump Settles the American Family’s Business

J.B. Shurk | March 1, 2026

Iran: Scalpel and Hammer

Clarice Feldman | March 1, 2026

President Trump’s Fixation On Heaven Is Good For America

Matt Kane | March 1, 2026

Will the Bond Market Wreck Europe?

Thomas Kolbe | March 1, 2026

Stop Prior Authorization to Empower We the Patients

Deane Waldman | March 1, 2026

The Cyber State of the Union

Julio Rivera | February 28, 2026

From Loyal Opposition to Sabotage

Delise Tattum | February 28, 2026

Climate Desperation: German E-trucks Exempted from Tolls

Thomas Kolbe | February 28, 2026

Sex, Espionage, And Betrayal In The American Revolution

S. David Sultzer | February 28, 2026

Geoffrey P. Hunt | February 28, 2026

The Democrat Party Represents Everybody but Americans

J.B. Shurk | February 27, 2026

Is America a Country for Americans? The Supreme Court Will Decide

Joseph Ford Cotto | February 27, 2026

The crucial role of British bases in Operation Epic Fury

Noel S. Williams | March 2, 2026

Trump has saved us from a global apocalypse

Andrea Widburg | March 2, 2026

Faith in the warriors who carry the mission

Christian Vezilj | March 2, 2026

Make Iran Great Again (continued)

Bill Ponton | March 2, 2026

The larger implications of Ilhan Omar’s screaming during the SOTU

Andrea Widburg | March 2, 2026

It happens every time Trump uses his war powers

Silvio Canto, Jr. | March 2, 2026

A bundled post covering lots of topics about the Iran War

Andrea Widburg | March 1, 2026

Epic Fury righteously directed at Iranian terror regime

Eric Utter | March 1, 2026

For those who care, Jews helped the U.S. get Olympic hockey gold

Farrell Bloch | March 1, 2026

The outlook for Iran after the war: collapse or transition?

Hassan Mahmoudi | March 1, 2026

The left’s compass always points to the perpetrator

Kevin Finn | March 1, 2026

The Mick said goodbye in ‘69

Silvio Canto, Jr. | March 1, 2026

On Iran, the eurochickens make fools of themselves

Monica Showalter | March 1, 2026

Operation Epic Fury: What next?

Howard J. Warner | March 1, 2026

A United States of Iran?

James Anthony | March 1, 2026

The real losers in NATO post-Iran

Noel S. Williams | March 1, 2026

Mike McDaniel | March 1, 2026

The good reason behind Operation Epic Fury

Allan J. Feifer | March 1, 2026

Tyler C. Chrestman | March 1, 2026

Donald Trump: the worst racist Nazi ever

Mike McDaniel | March 1, 2026

Foreign Policy > Iran

US Interests and a Far-Off Use of Force

Here is where isolationism collapses.

John F. Di Leo | March 2, 2026

At times like these, we are reminded of our Founding Fathers’ warnings — especially that of President Washington in his Farewell Address — to “avoid foreign entanglements.” 

Our Founding Fathers were students of history.  Much like history students today, an overwhelming amount of their studies had been focused on conflict between nations, and prisoners of war and battlefield deaths, and the costs of war to civilians and governments alike. 

Our Founding Fathers themselves had fought in the French and Indian War (our part of the larger conflict known as the Seven Years’ War).  And then of course we fought our own War of Independence — eight painful years from start to finish. 

So they were sensible to encourage their colleagues and successors to avoid the temptation of getting ensnared in foreign struggles unnecessarily.  The royal families of Europe — whether because of personality or revenge, or greed or religious disagreement — were seemingly always fighting, and with a fortunate ocean separating us from them, our Founding Fathers had reason to hope that we could resist those particular future wars. 

But they weren’t naïve; they had no expectation of being able to avoid all war, forever.  They knew that this New World would have plenty of its own challenges and would be likely to create its own conflicts, independent of the Old World ones. 

Our Founding Fathers knew there would be border challenges and assumed there would be outright invasions — with Mexico to the south and Canada to the north, with English and French and Spanish territories to the west, and with countless American Indian tribes (some friendly, many hostile) as far as the eye could see.  And then who knew what the future would hold as nation-states developed in South America and the Caribbean? 

When our Founders said to avoid foreign wars, they may have been exercising a euphemism: They really meant we shouldn’t go looking for trouble, because trouble would find us soon enough.  Our fledgling nation would need to keep our power dry, because if we overextended ourselves by joining the wars of Europe, we might be caught unprepared by Indians, Mexicans, islanders, or South Americans. 

And even if we conclude from this that we are right to avoid unnecessary entanglements, but we should be prepared for the ones that do indeed concern us, we have another question to face, one we are seeing play out at this very moment: How exactly to define which conflicts really do concern us? 

If we were right to avoid the battles between the English and the French or between the Catholic nations and the Protestant nations of that era, then surely the disagreements between the Shia and Sunni blocks of the Middle East are also too distant to warrant our involvement.  What concern of ours, we are asked, are the petty fights between Iran and the Emirates, or the Israeli unease at Teheran’s constant threats? 

For the answer to this one, we should look back at how quickly world commerce was transformed in the 18th century, and how our own third president handled that transformation at the beginning of the 19th. 

The American colonies had long had commercial vessels — privately owned merchant ships — sailing to customers in the Mediterranean.  The Barbary pirates of North Africa generally left them alone because American vessels were first protected by the English flag, then by the French flag.  But after the French Revolution, we lost any such protection, and the pirates stopped holding back and started seizing our ships and demanding bribe money with great frequency.

The Jefferson administration responded appropriately.  We sent a navy halfway ’round the world, defeated the pirates, and set a precedent that these United States would protect American interests — that means our people, our ships, our goods, our commerce — wherever in the world they were threatened.

In short, whatever today’s peacenik crowd may try to imply, America has always known that our interests don’t end at our land borders and seashores.

We may have international commitments by treaty, too, but first and foremost, American interests lie wherever there is American commerce.  The independent American ship owners and merchants who sailed the Mediterranean two centuries ago weren’t the exception; they were the rule.  If President Coolidge was right to say, “The business of America is business” — and he was — then by corollary, America’s military policy has always been to defend that business. 

So let’s take a moment to consider what that means today: Regarding the conflict with Iran, the evidence is simple.  Iran has been threatening to close the Strait of Hormuz, disrupting American commerce with Bahrain, Qatar, Kuwait, Jordan, and the eastern side of Saudi Arabia.  And Iranian puppets — the Houthis of Yemen, acting on Iran’s orders — have closed the Suez Canal and Red Sea for over two years now, disrupting ocean commerce with Egypt and the western shore of Saudi Arabia, but more importantly, costing the global economy billions of dollars per day (yes, billions per day for over two years now) by making half the world’s ocean shipping travel around Africa instead of using the Suez shortcut. 

The mullahs’ regime has rung up hundreds of other reasons that justify our action against Iran.  These two are just the most obvious ones from a commercial side. 

But looking beyond just Iran, how do we judge true American interests going forward?  What markers might indicate a reason for our naturally semi-isolationist posture to be set aside in order to take up arms? 

Education: At any given school year, there are at least 300,000 American students studying abroad, distributed across a host of countries, many in the foreign campuses of our own colleges.  That’s a clear U.S. interest.  (Remember the action in Grenada.) 

Tourism: Roughly a third of the American population travels internationally.  That means that at any moment, tens of millions of Americans may be visiting any of a hundred or more foreign countries.  While the majority are in Canada, Mexico, or the Caribbean, just because of convenience, still there are countless millions on short- or long-term trips all over the world.  These millions of American travelers are a clear U.S. interest.  (Remember Ion Perdicaris.) 

Business: Countless thousands of American businesses either own foreign subsidiaries or operate other foreign operations and have long-term employees stationed abroad, either working for their own foreign plants, or working on loan for foreign vendors.  This arena covers millions of people; billions of dollars of real estate and equipment; and billions of dollars’ worth of raw materials, finished goods, and work in progress.  Then there are those employees’ families and property in those distant countries for years at a time, depending on the duration of the posting.  These are all legitimate U.S. interests. 

American Servicemen: We have long established airbases, naval bases, and army bases abroad, on every continent and in every ocean, to ensure that the American safety superstructure is complete.  This wasn’t a single, one-time choice that the American public voted on, but it has long been popularly accepted that as the leader of the free world, we need a presence everywhere.  And to protect ourselves, our allies, and the example subgroups above, this archipelago of bases and postings is a very necessary U.S. interest. 

This list doesn’t pretend to be exhaustive.  But hopefully it demonstrates the simple fact that the interests of the United States don’t end at our shores, and frankly, they never have. 

We are an international nation, the leading light of an international economy.  As long as our people, our students, our businesses, our commercial holdings are scattered all over the world, our national interest has a far-off presence as well. 

Militarily speaking, that doesn’t mean we should ever go out looking for trouble.  But it does mean that when trouble comes looking for us, we do indeed have a legitimate interest to defend, more often than not. 

John F. Di Leo is a Chicagoland-based international transportation manager, trade compliance trainer, consultant and public speaker. Read his book on the surprisingly numerous varieties of vote fraud (The Tales of Little Pavel), his biting political satires on the Biden-Harris years (Evening Soup with Basement Joe, Volumes I, II, and III), and his collection of essays on public policy in the 2020s, Current Events and the Issues of Our Age, all available in eBook or paperback, exclusively on Amazon.

SUPPORT AMERICAN THINKER

Now more than ever, the ability to speak our minds is crucial to the republic we cherish. If what you see on American Thinker resonates with you, please consider supporting our work with a donation of as much or as little as you can give. Every dollar contributed helps us pay our staff and keep our ideas heard and our voices strong. Thank you.

Most Read Last 24hrs Last 48hrs Last 7 Days

Iran: Scalpel and Hammer

Clarice Feldman | March 1, 2026

On Iran, the eurochickens make fools of themselves

Monica Showalter | March 1, 2026

Donald Trump: the worst racist Nazi ever

Mike McDaniel | March 1, 2026

President Trump’s jaw-jaw has been a prelude to war-war with Iran

Andrea Widburg | February 28, 2026

Mike McDaniel | March 1, 2026

Iran: Scalpel and Hammer

Clarice Feldman | March 1, 2026

The Supreme Court’s Political Attack Masquerading as a Judicial Decision

S. David Sultzer | February 23, 2026

Did We Steal The Land?

M. E. Boyd | February 27, 2026

Pathetic: Abigail Spanberger delivers wretched response to President Trump's stellar SOTU

Monica Showalter | February 25, 2026

There is something terribly, horribly wrong with the current crop of Democrats

Patricia McCarthy | February 25, 2026

Iran: Scalpel and Hammer

Clarice Feldman | March 1, 2026

President Trump’s jaw-jaw has been a prelude to war-war with Iran

Andrea Widburg | February 28, 2026

From Loyal Opposition to Sabotage

Delise Tattum | February 28, 2026

Smackdown: Rep. Ilhan Omar spews tripe and hears from Iran's locals

Monica Showalter | February 28, 2026

Trump’s masterful statement about the attack on Iran

Andrea Widburg | February 28, 2026

Top Contributors Last 7 Days Last 30 Days

Trump continues to live rent free in their heads

The Clash of Civilizations Restarts History

Gen Z Men are Creating an American Tragedy and Internet Influencer 'Clavicular' Shows Why

Iran: Scalpel and Hammer

The Supreme Court’s Political Attack Masquerading as a Judicial Decision

Lots of News, Often Unverifiable

What happened to Somali fraud?

Trump continues to live rent free in their heads

Europe’s Civilizational War Will Be Bloody

Democrats are Desperate to Win the Midterms — Because They’re Losing Power

Our Clinton Nightmare Comes to a Franken End

Conservative beauties and the leftist beasts

When a Leftist Doxxer Gets Doxxed

Trump Buries Obama’s Climate Policy

Ad Free / Commenting Login

© American Thinker