Red Star Rising Over NYC: China’s Hidden Hand in the ‘Jews for Zohran’ Scam
If you thought New York politics couldn’t get more cynical, think again.
An exposé from The New York Post has shone a harsh spotlight on one more act in the city’s ideological theater of the absurd—Jews for Zohran, a meticulously choreographed campaign crafted to launder the record of Zohran Mamdani, the self-styled Democratic Socialist assemblyman from Queens with a well-documented history of Israel-bashing.
The group’s name sounds grassroots—almost quaint—like typical campaign affinity group fare.
But its roots lie not in Astoria or the Bronx, and certainly not in Israel, but halfway around the globe in Shanghai, where pro-Beijing billionaire Neville Roy Singham now resides.
And here’s the kicker: the political director behind “Jews for Zohran” is Alicia Singham Goodwin, niece of the Marxist tech mogul long accused of pushing Chinese Communist Party narratives through a web of shell organizations and activist fronts.
The niece of the China-based billionaire purportedly backing left-wing protest groups in the US spearheaded the ‘Jews for Zohran’ Mamdani campaign — a bid to give the Israel-bashing candidate cover from antisemitism accusations and win over Jewish voters, The Post reports.
Let that sink in. A family member of Neville Roy Singham—a CCP-aligned operative bankrolling far-left activism—is running cover for New York State Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani.
And Mamdani needs it. He has branded Israel an “apartheid” regime, endorsed the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement, and accused it of operating “in all its settler-colonial forms.”
Pressed during the June Democrat mayoral debate on whether Israel has the right to exist “as a Jewish state,” Mamdani replied, “As a state with equal rights.”
In a follow-up TV interview, he claimed, “I’m not comfortable supporting any state that has a hierarchy of citizenship on the basis of religion or anything else… Equality should be enshrined in every country in the world”.
The problem? It’s an ideological canard—a stock trope of the BDS movement, not an accurate reading of Israeli law.
While the Law of Return grants Jews........
© American Thinker
